Scoring framework
TV evaluation rubric
Better Buy Lab uses this rubric to organize TV research before any final score exists. It describes what matters, what evidence is still required, and where buyer risk usually hides. This category hub uses the rubric to explain how Better Buy Lab structures category research before final scoring is available.
Picture quality
Does the TV have the contrast, color, black-level control, and HDR behavior that fit the viewing room?
- Evidence needed
- Panel type, local dimming behavior, HDR format support, viewing-angle notes, and verified model variant.
- Current output
- No numeric score rendered until verified rubric evidence exists.
Bright-room performance
Can it handle daylight, reflections, sports, and family-room viewing without looking washed out?
- Evidence needed
- Brightness positioning, screen finish, reflection handling notes, and room-light assumptions.
- Current output
- No numeric score rendered until verified rubric evidence exists.
Gaming features
Does the feature set match the console, PC, refresh-rate, VRR, HDMI, and latency needs of the buyer?
- Evidence needed
- Refresh-rate support, HDMI 2.1 availability, VRR notes, gaming mode caveats, and size/region checks.
- Current output
- No numeric score rendered until verified rubric evidence exists.
Motion
Will sports, games, and fast camera movement look clean enough for the intended use?
- Evidence needed
- Panel technology, motion-handling notes, refresh class, and known caveats from existing research data.
- Current output
- No numeric score rendered until verified rubric evidence exists.
Smart platform
Is the built-in platform likely to be convenient, app-complete, and acceptable without extra hardware?
- Evidence needed
- Operating system, app ecosystem, remote/control assumptions, and setup-friction notes.
- Current output
- No numeric score rendered until verified rubric evidence exists.
Setup fit
Does the TV fit the room, wall, stand, seating distance, cable plan, and everyday household use?
- Evidence needed
- Screen size, mounting/setup assumptions, port access, viewing distance, and room-fit notes.
- Current output
- No numeric score rendered until verified rubric evidence exists.
Verification status
Which product facts are safe to show publicly, and which claims still need approval evidence?
- Evidence needed
- Exact model match, region/SKU confirmation, source freshness, image rights, and schema eligibility.
- Current output
- No numeric score rendered until verified rubric evidence exists.
Buyer-risk notes
What can make this a bad buy even if the headline specs look strong?
- Evidence needed
- Caveats from existing product data, replacement risk, region variance, and missing approval gates.
- Current output
- No numeric score rendered until verified rubric evidence exists.